Issue - meetings

Planning Application - Application No. 2022/93465

Meeting: 02/03/2023 - Strategic Planning Committee (Item 15)

15 Planning Application - Application No. 2022/93465 pdf icon PDF 370 KB

 

Variation of Condition 30 (minerals) on previous permission 2000/90671 for extension of Carr Hill Quarry including the extraction of sandstone and clay, associated activities and its restoration by means of infill with inert wastes -

Carr Hill Quarry, Barnsley Road, Upper Cumberworth, Huddersfield.

 

Contact: Farzana Tabasum, Planning Services

 

Ward(s) affected: Kirkburton and Denby Dale

 

Decision:

Approval delegated to the Head of Planning and Development.

 

Minutes:

The Committee considered Application 2022/93465 in respect of the variation of Condition 30 (minerals) on previous permission 2000/90671 for extension of Carr Hill Quarry including the extraction of sandstone and clay, associated activities and its restoration by means of infill with inert wastes at Carr Hill Quarry, Barnsley Road, Upper Cumberworth, Huddersfield.

 

Under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 37, the Committee received a representation from Chris Ballam (on behalf of the applicant).

 

Resolved –

 

1)       That, approval of the application and issue of the decision notice be delegated to the Head of Planning and Development in order to:

 

a)    complete the rewording of condition 30, on receipt of accurate final site layout drawings showing appropriate contouring details.

 

b)    secure a Section 106 agreement to cover the following matters:

 

to link the existing structures and their use on the application site, to the applicant’s haulage business situated 240 metres to the west, on the A635 Holmfirth Road.

 

2)       In the circumstances where the Section 106 agreement has not been completed within three months of the date of the Committee’s resolution then the Head of Planning and Development shall consider whether permission should be refused on the grounds that the proposals are unacceptable in the absence of the mitigation and benefits that would have been secured and, if so, the Head of Planning and Development be authorised to determine the application and impose appropriate reasons for refusal under delegated powers.

 

A recorded vote was taken, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 42 (5), as follows;

For: Councillors Hall, Hawkins, Pattison, Pinnock, Sokhal and Thompson (6 votes)

Against: (no votes)