Issue - meetings

Planning Application - Application No: 2023/91092

Meeting: 03/08/2023 - Strategic Planning Committee (Item 10)

10 Planning Application - Application No: 2023/90509 pdf icon PDF 330 KB

 

Erection of 2 storey, 5 classroom teaching block including toilet facilities and staff / store rooms at North Huddersfield Trust School, Woodhouse Hall Road, Fartown, Huddersfield.

 

Ward affected: Ashbrow

 

Contact: Katie Chew, Planning Services

Decision:

Application approved (delegated).

Minutes:

The Committee gave consideration to Application 2023/90509 – Erection of 2 storey, 5 classroom teaching block including toilet facilities and staff/store rooms at North Huddersfield Trust School, Woodhouse Hall Road, Fartown, Huddersfield.

 

RESOLVED

 

1)    That authority be delegated to the Head of Planning and Development to approve the application, issue the decision notice and complete the list of conditions including matters relating to;  

 

-  Time Limit (three years)

-  Development in accordance with approved plans

-  Contaminated land investigation conditions

-  Noise Assessment

-  Construction Environmental Management Plan

-  Travel Plan

-  Scheme of mitigation works at Woodhouse Hill Junction

-  Submission of an Arboricultural Method Statement prior to works   

   commencing on site

-  Submission of a detailed planting scheme/proposal for the new    

   planting shown to the south

-  Full, detailed sections of the proposed green roof should be

   submitted prior to its installation, this should also include loading

   information, species to be planted and details of its maintenance

 

2) That authority be delegated to the Head of Planning and Development to secure a S106 Agreement to cover off site highway works for junction improvements to Woodhouse Hill Junction – contribution of £50,000.

 

3) That, pursuant to (2) above, in circumstances where the S106 Agreement has not been completed within three months of this decision, the Head of Planning and Development shall be authorised to consider whether permission should be refused on the grounds that the proposals are unacceptable in the absence of the benefits that would have been secured, and would therefore be permitted to determine the Application and impose appropriate reasons for refusal under delegated powers.

 

A Recorded Vote was taken in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 42 (5) as follows;

For: Councillors Armer, Crook, S Hall, Pattison, A Pinnock and Sokhal (6 votes)

Against: (no votes)