Agenda item

Leader of the Council and Finance Portfolio Holder - Priorities 2025/26

The Leader of Council and the Finance and Regeneration Portfolio Holder have been invited to attend the meeting to set out their priorities for 2025/2026. The Corporate Portfolio Holder will attend a future meeting.

Minutes:

Councillor Carole Pattison, the Leader of Council and Councillor Graham Turner, the Portfolio Holder for Finance, were welcomed to the meeting to talk about their priorities for 2025/26.

 

Councillor Pattison explained that:

·       The vision, eight shared outcomes, and four partnership strategies remained the same. The vision for Kirklees was to combine a sustainable economy with a great quality of life for families and communities and address inequalities.

·       Delivery of the four priorities set out in the 2025/26 Council Plan, alongside partners, would help to achieve this vision:

-       Getting the basics right

-       Protecting the vulnerable and achieving inclusion

-       Thriving people and communities

-       Local economic growth

·       The aim was to create a longer-term vision next municipal year, assisted by the commitment from the Government to a three-year financial settlement agreement, which was expected in November.

·       Recent progress and achievements under each priority were highlighted.

·       The next steps including celebrating and building on successes, taking opportunities for transformation and continuing to work across council services to deliver the priorities and focus more on customers and getting the basics right.

 

Councillor Turner provided an overview of the key priorities across the Finance and Regeneration Portfolio:

·       The most important was the delivery of a balanced budget for 2026/2027 and proposals would be presented to Council in February 2026.

·       The three-year financial settlement would aid the development of a better longer-term financial strategy and the Council was in a good position to move forward.

·       The Council Plan emphasised economic growth, thriving communities and inclusive service delivery, within the Place Directorate there was a focus on regeneration, housing, infrastructure and environmental transformation.

·       The aim was to review all items in the Council’s Capital Plan, with the assistance of the Section 151 Officer, by September 2026.

·       The Council would continue to seek out grants and pooling opportunities for investment.

·       There were many active, varied regeneration projects across Kirklees; it was important that the programme of regeneration continued, to help create employment for the future and support the local economy.

·       Officers were working in partnership with the University of Huddersfield and local colleges to ensure that people had the necessary skills for the workplace of the future.

·       An outline was given of the work that had been undertaken to develop a new Local Plan and the next steps. The Local Development Scheme (LDS) had been submitted to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) in March 2025. Early community engagement had resulted in 650 plus responses.

·       Housing growth was a key feature of the regeneration strategy, with a strong emphasis on the delivery of diverse, inclusive and future proofed housing across the district.

·       There were a number of strategic sites in the delivery pipeline and the Ash View Extra Care Housing in Ashbrow was now completed; members of the Committee were encouraged to visit the site.

·       Work would also continue with investors, the Government and developers to increase town centre living across the borough.

 

 

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

  • In respect of improvements in air quality, it was acknowledged that reduced emissions from vehicles had contributed to this along with various measures being taken to help the flow of traffic in air quality management zones, such as at Ainley Top.
  • The provision of 18 new SEND school places was welcomed and it was questioned what the plans were to ensure the necessary resources to address the growing need in this area.
  • There was a myriad of plans to address this issue. The two new specialist schools would provide additional places for SEND children but these would also be better places, for example provision for girls with Social Emotional and Mental Health needs who had previously had to attend education provision outside the district. This would also have a financial benefit for the Authority.
  • There had also been an increase in ‘Additional Resource Provision’ and schools working in clusters to better meet the needs of those attending local, mainstream schools and maximising the use of available resources.
  • The backlog, associated with difficulties in getting assessments, had decreased and the Council was discussing working with other local authorities on this issue, but the demand continued to increase.
  • The impact on the whole of the family was acknowledged and it was considered that a new approach to SEND would bring about improvements in the process. There were also new Government proposals in respect of Education Health and Care Plans which would make the process easier in the future.
  • The excellent service provided for people with dementia and their relatives and carers by Knowl Park House, in Mirfield, was acknowledged. Provision such as this could delay the need for people to go into residential care, but the capacity was limited and there was need for more such provision. It was noted that the staff also provided wider advice and support alongside the day care services offered.
  • It was considered that residents’ understanding of ‘getting the basics right’ differed from the Council’s perception. It was explained that work was underway on a transformation project focusing on customer expectations. The aim was to try and ensure that the expectations matched the service that could be provided.  The importance of effective communication was a key issue, both in terms of managing resident’s expectations and being able to provide a response in a timely manner.
  • Whilst the improvements to the Spen Valley Greenway were welcomed it was of concern that the waste bins were not being emptied and this had resulted in an accumulation of rubbish at entry/exit points which was unsightly and potentially hazardous. Although there could be complications in terms of land ownership and responsibility it was acknowledged that this should be addressed but that there was also the need to engage with and enable the community in respect of the responsible disposal of rubbish. There had been a recent review of bins and the position in respect of the emptying of the greenway bins would be checked. 
  • Positive feedback was provided in terms of library services, including the engagement with scrutiny on this issue, and the improvements and progress made in Children’s and Adults Services.
  • The importance of the role and contribution of Elected Members both in terms of their knowledge of activities and groups in their communities, and the leadership and promotion of events, was acknowledged. It would be helpful for an assessment to be undertaken on the value of existing events and the benefits of them being maintained.
  • It was noted that housing growth was not only about increased capacity, but also about ensuring that quality, suitable homes were built in the right places to help create communities. Quality housing led to better outcomes in terms of education and health.
  • There was also a need to increase the numbers of people living in quality accommodation in town centres to boost economic activity and help them to thrive.
  • In response to a question in relation addressing the impact of housing developments on existing services, particularly healthcare services, in areas where they were already at capacity; it was noted that there was a national shortage of doctors in the UK alongside a growing population and changes in demographics, which would continue to be challenging until the shortage could be resolved. The Council did not have control over this provision.
  • The view was expressed that the Council had a responsibility, when making decisions around larger housing developments, to factor in, at an early stage, the infrastructure and services that were available; doctors, dentists, schools and how new provision could be attracted/provided to those areas, but also footpaths and linkages to ensure access to amenities. It was explained that the Health and Wellbeing Board was involved in the development of the Local Plan and information on demand and possible locations for surgeries etc, and opportunities to promote active travel would be part of the considerations. There was a robust process that was followed prior to sites being included in the Local Plan which would include issues such as local highways, traffic predictions and modelling for school places. Larger sites, in particular, would take many years to be completed and facilities, such as GP’s surgeries, would follow in response to demand.
  • The Government had just released the ‘10 Year Health Plan’ which would make a difference to how the Council, and Combined Authority, planned health services and how these services were provided in the future.
  • Innovative projects were also being developed, for example the University of Huddersfield was working with the NHS and the Health and Wellbeing Board on creating the first walk-in diagnostic centre, coupled to a University, in the country.

 

RESOLVED –

 

(1)      That the Leader and the Portfolio Holder be thanked for attending the meeting to present their priorities for 2025/26 and to give a progress update.

 

(2)      That the priorities for 2025/26 be noted and a progress report be presented at an appropriate time.

 

(3)      That it be noted that the Corporate Portfolio Holder will attend the next meeting of the Committee to outline her priorities.

 

(4)      That a report on the work being done in respect of ‘getting the basics right’ be added to the work programme and it be recommended that this work should include a strong focus on effective and timely communication.

 

(5)      That the Committee:

(i)  Receive an update in respect of cyber security.

(ii) Consider undertaking a visit to Ash View Extra Care Housing Scheme.