The panel received a presentation on the
financial position across the Kirklees health system for the
2025/26 financial year.
Gary Boothby, Executive Director of Finance,
Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust advised the Panel
that NHS partners were projecting a collective deficit of
£7.5 million, with Kirklees contributing a planned deficit of
£380,000 after delivering £46.43 million in
efficiencies. Other partners aimed to break even, contingent on
achieving £28.7 million in savings. Overall, the system was
targeting £75.13 million in efficiencies, representing
approximately 5–6% of partner budgets. These figures exclude
the £7.7 million stretch target allocated to Kirklees as part
of the wider West Yorkshire system stretch target.
Efficiencies were being pursued through a
combination of transactional, tactical, and transformational
approaches. All partners had implemented Quality Impact Assessment
and Equality Impact Assessment processes to evaluate the
implications of proposed savings. A shared principle had been
agreed to avoid cost shunting between organisations.
The panel was advised of significant risks to
financial plan delivery, including performance-related income
clawbacks, system-wide accountability, where failure by one partner
affects all, and operational pressures such as winter demand,
industrial action, and staffing challenges. Recruitment and
retention issues persisted, particularly within the Integrated Care
Board, where organisational changes had led to a loss of local
expertise and local knowledge. The system was actively identifying
recurrent opportunities to meet the stretch target for 2026/27 and
beyond, focusing on slowing or stopping spend rather than
additional efficiencies.
Questions and comments were invited from
Members of the Health and Social Care, and Children’s
Scrutiny Panels, and the following was raised:
- Clarification was requested on the
principle of “no cost shunting,” which was explained as
a system-wide approach to avoid shifting costs between
organisations at the expense of patient care and overall value for
public money.
- Concerns were raised about the
clarity and accessibility of the presentation slides, which
contained jargon and unexplained abbreviations.
- Members asked for further
explanation of the financial risks to delivery, including the
impact on organisations such as Kirkwood Hospice.
- The panel discussed the significant
changes within the ICB, including the mandated 50% reduction in
running costs, and the uncertainty around future service delivery
responsibilities.
- Questions were raised about the
“stretch” target of £33 million across West
Yorkshire, with Kirklees’ share being £7.7 million, and
how services were being reviewed to identify duplication and
improve system-wide efficiency.
- Members sought reassurance that
service users were being engaged in decision-making and that
patient impact was being monitored through Quality Impact
Assessments and Equality Impact Assessments.
- The panel queried the rationale
behind the projected £7.5 million deficit despite
£105.2 million in efficiency savings, and asked how this
would be addressed at year-end and noted that the £7.5
million was part of the West Yorkshire System which balanced with
various funding changes taking place across the system.
- Historical context was discussed,
with members noting that efficiency savings had been a recurring
challenge over many years, and questioning whether savings had ever
not been required.
- It was confirmed that savings must
be made recurrently to avoid compounding future financial
challenges, and that national benchmarking was being used to
identify opportunities.
- Members asked whether any partners
were at risk of under-delivering on activity targets, which could
result in financial penalties or loss of income to the system and
noted that there was potential income loss to the West Yorkshire
system if partners did not deliver the volume of activity planned,
and performance improvements they had signed up to.
- Staffing concerns were raised,
including whether efficiencies would result in redundancies. It was
confirmed that CHFT had no plans for redundancies and that
efficiencies would be met through natural turnover.
- The potential role of AI in
delivering efficiencies was discussed, with recognition that while
AI could contribute to cost savings, initial investment, training,
and governance would be required before benefits could be
realised.
- The panel acknowledged the ongoing
uncertainty surrounding ICB changes and their impact on the
Kirklees health landscape, and noted the current delivery of
£105 million in efficiencies against a provisional
system-wide deficit of £7.5 million
RESOLVED –
1)
That Officers be thanked for their attendance and presentation.
2)
That the Health System Financial Overview 2025/26 be noted.