Agenda and minutes

Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee - Friday 12th September 2025 10.00 am

Venue: Council Chamber - Town Hall, Huddersfield. View directions

Contact: Sheila Dykes  Email: sheila.dykes@kirklees.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

23.

Membership of Committee

To receive apologies for absence from those Members who are unable to attend the meeting.

Minutes:

 

No apologies were received. 

 

24.

Minutes of Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 336 KB

To approve the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on the 11th July 2025.

Minutes:

RESOLVED -

That the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 11th July 2025 be approved as a correct record.

25.

Declaration of Interests pdf icon PDF 20 KB

Members will be asked to say if there are any items on the Agenda in which they have any disclosable pecuniary interests or any other interests, which may prevent them from participating in any discussion of the items or participating in any vote upon the items.

Minutes:

No interests were declared.

26.

Admission of the Public

Most agenda items take place in public. This only changes where there is a need to consider exempt information, as contained at Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. You will be informed at this point which items are to be recommended for exclusion and to be resolved by the Committee.

Minutes:

All items were considered in the public session.

27.

Deputations/Petitions

The Committee will receive any petitions and/or deputations from members of the public. A deputation is where up to five people can attend the meeting and make a presentation on some particular issue of concern. A member of the public can also submit a petition at the meeting relating to a matter on which the body has powers and responsibilities.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 10, Members of the Public must submit a deputation in writing, at least three clear working days in advance of the meeting and shall subsequently be notified if the deputation shall be heard. A maximum of four deputations shall be heard at any one meeting.

 

Minutes:

No deputations or petitions were received.

28.

Public Question Time

To receive any public questions.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 11, the period for the asking and answering of public questions shall not exceed 15 minutes.

 

Any questions must be submitted in writing at least three clear working days in advance of the meeting.

Minutes:

No public questions were received.

29.

Council Plan and Performance Update - Quarter 1 Report 2025-2026 pdf icon PDF 304 KB

A presentation will be given in respect of the Council Plan and Performance Update Report for Quarter 1 2025-2026, with reference to the report being submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

Contact: Mike Henry – Head of Data and Insight

Minutes:

Councillor Carole Pattison, the Leader of the Council introduced the report in respect of the Council Plan and Performance for Quarter 1 of 2025/26, supported by Mike Henry, Head of Data and Insight.

 

The report had been submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025 and included:

·       Details on activity and delivery against the four priorities within the Council Plan and planned activity for Quarter 2.

·       The latest data against the Council’s key measures for 2025/2026, including a summary of the direction of travel and planned activity for Quarter 2.

·       Benchmarking data to contextualise the demand and performance trends and enable comparison of Kirklees with regional and national rates.

 

The following points were highlighted:

·       Getting the Basics Right:

-          Tight budget controls had been maintained.

-          The Highways Capital Plan 2025-27 had been approved.

-          Improvements were being made in respect of the focus on customers.

·       Protecting the Vulnerable:

-          Investment had been made into additional provision for children with . good progress towards the improvement and expansion of two special schools.

-          A scheme supporting neurodiversity inclusion had commenced in 14 schools.

-          Modernisation of day care facilities for adults with complex learning disabilities and autism was underway.

-          A dedicated apprenticeship scheme had been introduced to support care leavers.

·       Thriving People and Communities:

-          Strengthening of partnerships continued.

-          Environmental sustainability improvement activities included tree planting and management/support for the White Rose Forest partnership.

-          Public safety issues were being addressed

-          A Physical Activity Strategy was being developed.

·       Local Economic Growth:

-          The Inclusive Economic Strategy had been approved.

-          Good progress was being made in relation to the Cultural Heart and Dewsbury Blueprint.

-          A range of projects were progressing in Batley, Cleckheaton, Heckmondwike, Holmfirth and Marsden.

-          The Council’s Transport Strategy had recently been approved.

·       There were ongoing challenges in respect of:

-          Increased demand for adult social care services.

-          Rising numbers of looked-after children.

-          An increase in incidents of fly-tipping.

·       In relation to performance against key measures:

-          The percentage of Education, Health and Care Plans issued within 20 weeks had improved.

-          Significant improvements had been made in addressing damp, mould, and condensation cases in Council properties.

-          A reduction had been achieved in respect of the number of households in temporary accommodation.

 

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

·       In response to a question about the rise in adult social care cases and early intervention and prevention, it was explained that efforts were being made to help keep people in their homes longer, including through the use of technology. The recently opened day care facility in Mirfield provided respite care and also provided information and support for carers and relatives of people with dementia.

·       The increase in fly-tipping was of concern and it was suggested that a comprehensive strategy, including media campaigns, CCTV, convictions and community engagement would assist in addressing this issue. Assurance was given that the fly-tipping strategy was being  ...  view the full minutes text for item 29.

30.

Devolution Update - Impact on Kirklees and Engagement at Regional Level pdf icon PDF 284 KB

The report provides an update on the Government’s Devolution Programme  and the impact on Kirklees and engagement at regional level.

 

Contact: Nick Howe – Policy and Partnerships Manager

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council, Councillor Carole Pattison, presented a report which summarised the contents of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill for the Committee’s information and to facilitate consideration of the potential impact on Kirklees and engagement at regional level. Kelly Hollis, Policy and Partnership Officer was also present for the item.

 

The following points were highlighted:

·       The bill had recently had its second reading in the House of Commons.

·       There had been recent changes in Government ministerial roles and it was not known at this stage if there would be any changes to the bill as a result.

·       Local government reorganisation would have a less significant impact on Kirklees, as it was already a Unitary Authority.

·       The West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA) would be designated as an Established Mayoral Strategic Authority, with a few changes in governance.

·       The impact of the bill would be in relation to the integrated settlement, which was expected to be implemented in April 2026.

·       WYCA was working to identify the additional powers and funding that the region would wish to be devolved and was actively preparing for future changes. The relevant workstreams were set out in the report and updates were anticipated in the near future.

·       Further detail was awaited from the government across a number of areas including the neighbourhood governance arrangements. Regulations and guidance, on this and other elements, such as the local audit system, would be issued separately following the Bill becoming law.

 

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

·       There was a need to know how neighbourhood governance would operate. Various methods had been used in Kirklees in the past with use of the Place Standard, and area committees. Funding would be needed to effectively implement it and allow focus on neighbourhood priorities.

·       It was noted that the Local Government Association were advocating for ‘new burdens funding’ to support neighbourhood governance.

·       The restoration of the alternative vote system for electing regional mayors and the proposals for ‘Community Right to Buy’ were welcomed.

 

RESOLVED-

(1)  That the Leader and the Policy and Partnerships Officer be thanked for attending to update the Committee.

(2)  That it be noted that further updates will be provided to members of the Committee, via a briefing note, in December 2025 and February 2026.

 

 

31.

Corporate Risk - Quarter 1 Report 2025-2026 pdf icon PDF 299 KB

A presentation will be given in respect of the Quarter 1 2025-2026 Corporate Risk Report, with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

Contact: Martin Dearnley – Head of Audit and Risk

Minutes:

Councillor Graham Turner, Finance and Regeneration Portfolio Holder, introduced the Corporate Risk Report for Quarter 1 2025/26 with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September, supported by Martin Dearnley, Head of Audit and Risk.

 

The following points were highlighted:

·       There had been minimal change since Quarter 4.

·       One new risk had been added in respect of project management and delivery. This was to be further developed and was rated amber.

·       Two risks had been removed: ‘Adult Social Care Assurance Framework’ and ‘Data Insight for Adults Services’ and were now being managed at service level.

·       The score for ‘Climate Change’ had increased due to gaps in skills and staffing affecting the ability to deliver grant-funded initiatives and secure future third-party funding.

·       The ‘Budget Monitoring and Management’ risk score had reduced, reflecting the tracking and control in place, although it was acknowledged that financial risk remained a key risk.

·       The score for ‘Procurement Processes’ had reduced due to the successful implementation of new procedures and staff training aligned with the Procurement Act.

·       There were 16 red-rated risks, including ‘Medium-Term Financial Sustainability’, ‘Cybersecurity’, ‘Contract Management’, ‘SEND Provision’, ‘Homelessness and Temporary Accommodation’, ‘Housing Safety and Quality’, and ‘Capital Plan Management’.

·       An overview of the full register with information having been provided in relation to the current and previous risk score, the controls in operation and the actions being taken.

 

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

·       It would be a good idea to have an opportunities register,especially in areas like climate change.

·       The co-benefits of action on climate change should be emphasised, such as reduced fuel bills, improved air quality, and job creation.

·       Issues with staffing and recruitment in climate-related roles was of concern, as this could potentially limit the Council's ability to take opportunities, an example being the Warm Homes Local Funding.

·       Climate change was acknowledged as a significant challenge and the view was expressed that, whilst more could always be done, the Council was doing what it could within the constraints.  It was noted that the difficulties in recruitment extended beyond local government.

·       Local area energy plans were being developed by some other local authorities and this was an issue that the Environment and Climate Change Scrutiny Panel should look at.

Several initiatives were underway in respect of alternative provision for temporary accommodation and there was a strong desire to reduce reliance on bed and breakfast accommodation. and improve homelessness support.

·       There was a hope that upcoming legislation aimed at regulating landlords and improving housing security for tenants may assist in preventing some homelessness.

 

RESOLVED –

(1)  That the Cabinet Member and the Head of Audit and Risk be thanked for attending to update the Committee.

(2)  That the current position be noted and it be recommended that these reports continue to be submitted to the Committee on a regular basis so that Lead Members can pick up any items within the remit of their Panel that may require further scrutiny.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 31.

32.

Corporate Financial Monitoring Report - Quarter 1 2025-2026 pdf icon PDF 308 KB

A presentation will be given in respect of financial monitoring for the General Fund, Revenue, Designated School Grant, Housing Revenue Account (HRA) and Capital Plan as at Quarter 1 2025-2026, with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

Contact: Kevin Mulvaney – Service Director of Finance

Minutes:

Kevin Mulvaney, the Service Director, Finance gave a presentation in relation to the financial monitoring for Quarter 1 2025/26, with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Regeneration, Councillor Graham Turner, was present and introduced the item.

 

The presentation went through:

·       The revenue headlines.

·       Quarter 1 Forecast, with a breakdown across each directorate.

·       The high-level variations for each directorate.

·       Analysis of the variances for each directorate.

·       Housing Revenue Account (HRA) position.

·       Capital headlines and re-profiling.

·       Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) position.

 

The following points were highlighted:

·       A projected overspend of £5.9 million was reported for Quarter 1, noting that this was the lowest Q1 overspend since the pandemic and there was optimism about achieving a balanced budget by year-end.

·       Key financial pressures continue to stem from demand-led services such as Children’s Services and Adult Social Care.

·       Investment in future service delivery in these areas was ongoing, although the benefits would take time to have an impact.

·       Children’s Services showed a £3.9 million overspend, primarily due to increased numbers of looked after children, external placements and a rising average weekly cost. It was noted however, that Kirklees compared favourably to statistical neighbours in terms of the numbers of looked-after children.

·       Adult Social Care projected a circa £1.7 million overspend, with significant challenges in achieving savings targets related to client income and debt collection.

·       Place Directorate faced a £1.5 million overspend, mitigated partially by reserves for home-to-school transport. The other pressure areas were property management and maintenance costs and land bank, and parking and highways.

·       Public Health, Corporate and Central showed an underspend of £0.7 million, although attention was drawn to additional demand affecting legal services.

·       The Council was using contingency reserves to manage pressures, including £1.5 million for home to school transport and circa £400k for the delayed care homes transfer.

·       The HRA was broadly balanced with minor variances.

·       The Capital Plan had been reprofiled with approximately 10 million moved to future years.

·       The DSG deficit was forecast to increase by £12.5 million, bringing the cumulative deficit to over £75 million, noting that this was a national issue and a White Paper was expected in Autumn 2025 which would establish the Government’s approach.

 

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

·       The Council had entered into a ‘Safety Valve Agreement’ with the Department for Education (DfE) to manage high needs block pressures. The Council had committed £10 million over five years, and Government approximately £2.3 million annually plus a significant additional grant to support the provision of two special schools, with the aim of reducing the cost of external placements.

·       In response to a question about the Government’s approach and the conditions attached to such agreements, it was explained that the current government was honouring existing agreements but not entering into new ones.  It was anticipated that future policy would be included in the upcoming White Paper.

·       It was noted that the Council  ...  view the full minutes text for item 32.

33.

Medium Term Financial Strategy pdf icon PDF 305 KB

A presentation will be given in respect of the Council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy, with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

Contact: Kevin Mulvaney – Service Director Finance

Minutes:

Kevin Mulvaney, the Service Director, Finance gave a presentation on the Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS), with reference to the report submitted to Cabinet on 9th September 2025.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Regeneration, Councillor Graham Turner, was present and introduced the item.

 

The presentation went through:

·       The basis of the Government’s Fair Funding Review 2.0.

·       The Key Funding and Pay Assumptions.

·       An explanation of the 2026-27 Funding.

·       2026-27 MTFS Build Up, including a breakdown by directorate.

·       MTFS Summary Position 2026-27 to 2030-31

·       Next Steps.

 

The following points were highlighted:

·       The MTFS established the financial framework for the Council’s budget planning for 2026/27 to 2023/2031 and reflected assumptions in relation to funding, inflation, service demand, and national policy changes.

·       A budget gap of £18 million was forecast for 2026/27 which would require some reduction in budget pressures and new savings to deliver a balanced budget.

·       The recent changes in the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) were noted and advice was awaited on whether this would change the approach in terms of funding local government.

·       The Government’s Fair Funding Review consultation had concluded in August 2025 and the Government response was expected in mid to late October.

·       The MTFS assumed Kirklees would gain funding but the Government had stated that the figures were not confirmed. A prudent position had been taken of 60% of the figure from the modelling, which equated to £6.7 million.

·       The assumptions in terms of Council Tax increase and pay inflation.

·       The position in respect of the Collection Fund and Reserves.

·       The key cost and income pressures, across the directorates.

·       A cumulative gap of £56.3 million over five years.

·       The report would be submitted to Council on 17th September 2025.

·       Future action, in the short term:

-          Review and update pressures based on latest information

-          Finalise Capital Plan review

-          Give Services three-year savings targets.

-          Await Government response, Local Government Policy Statement, and Chancellor’s budget (26th November 2025).

-          Budget proposals to be submitted to Cabinet on 2nd December 2025.

Questions and comments were invited from Committee Members, with the following issues being covered:

·       The assumed gain from the Fair Funding allocation was welcomed but was insufficient given the scale of the challenges faced by the Council. It was noted that the gain from Fair Funding was a one-year figure, with potential to rise over the three years if 100% of the modelled gain was realised.

·       In response to queries about the Council’s contributions to the West Yorkshire Pension Fund, it was explained that:

-          The fund was currently in surplus and a consultation was underway (closing 3rd October) regarding potential reductions in employer contributions.

-          Representations would be made to support significant savings, whilst recognising the need for sustainability. 

-          A 1% reduction in employer contributions could equate to savings of over £2 million.

-          No assumptions had been built into the MTFS, pending the outcome of the consultation.

-          There would not be an impact on members’ pensions.

 

RESOLVED  ...  view the full minutes text for item 33.

34.

Allocation of Scrutiny Co-optee for 2025-26 pdf icon PDF 264 KB

A report will be submitted which seeks approval for the allocation of a co-optee to the Scrutiny Panel for the municipal year 2025/26.

 

Contact: Sheila Dykes – Principal Governance Officer

Minutes:

The Committee considered a report in respect of the allocation of a co-optee to the Environment and Climate Change Scrutiny Panel for the remainder of the 2025/26 municipal year.

 

RESOLVED –

That the appointment of Kevin Evans as a co-opted member on the Environment and Climate Change Scrutiny Panel, for the remainder of the 2025/26 municipal year, be approved.

35.

Lead Members' Updates

The Lead Members for the Children’s, Growth & Regeneration, Environmental & Climate Change and Health & Adult Social Care Scrutiny Panels will update the Committee on the work currently being undertaken by their Panels.

 

Contact: Sheila Dykes – Principal Governance Officer

Minutes:

The Lead Members for each of the Scrutiny Panels gave an update in relation to the work currently being undertaken by their panel:

·       Environmental & Climate Change

·       Health and Adult Social Care

·       Growth & Regeneration

·       Children’s

 

The Chair of the Committee provided an update in respect of the Armed Forces Covenant (AFC), reporting that:

·       The Council had been awarded the Gold Award in the AFC Employer Recognition Scheme for 2025, in recognition of its outstanding commitment to supporting the armed forces community. Congratulations were offered to all those involved.

·       There had been a good response to the introduction of an informal armed forces staff network, with a mix of veterans, reservists, cadet force adult volunteers and family members expressing interest.

·       A networking event and drop-in had been arranged in partnership with Huddersfield Royal Infirmary on 24th September 2025.

36.

Work Programme 2025-2026 pdf icon PDF 416 KB

The latest version of the Committee’s Work Programme for 2025-2026 will be submitted for consideration.

 

Contact: Sheila Dykes – Principal Governance Officer

Minutes:

The latest version of the Committee’s Work Programme for 2025-2026 was submitted for consideration.